Amtrak Photo Archive
an unofficial Amtrak site
the new REEFERS
|
|
|
Photo Credit | |
Los
Angeles CA Amtrak reefers being loaded with southern California starwberries at Redondo Junction facility |
April 20, 2002 | Steve Hoskins | ||
74001 | Phildelphia PA | July 24, 2000 | Rob Palmer | |
74001 | Los Angeles CA | July 6, 2001 | ||
74010 | ABQ | March 22, 2003 | Jim Hebner | |
74010 | ABQ on train #4 |
March 22, 2003 | Jim Hebner | |
74010 | ABQ | March 22, 2003 | Jim Hebner | |
74039 | Chicago IL | Dec 2005 | Jim Hebner | |
74049 | Albany-Rensselaer NY | March 30, 2002 | Bill Schopp | |
74049 | Albany-Rensselaer NY Alex has a website |
April 16, 2002 | Alex Stroshane | |
74055 | Fullerton CA in the Southwest Chief |
Feb 15, 2002 | Wayne Buser | |
74057 | Los Angeles CA | July 8, 2001 | Charles White | |
74076 | Berea OH in the Pennsylvanian |
August 6. 2001 | Kennedy How | |
74077 LARGE VIEW |
St. Louis MO on the rear of train 22 in on Monday. Rumor sez there are 200 on order |
June 11, 2001 | Marty Simane | |
74077 | St. Louis MO nice end view |
June 11, 2001 | Marty Simane | |
74077 | Los Angeles CA | July 8, 2001 | Charles White | |
74077 | Los Angeles CA | July 8, 2001 | Charles White | |
74077 | Los Angeles CA | July 8, 2001 | Charles White | |
74077 |
Los Angeles CA NOTE THE BUILD DATE! |
July 8, 2001 | Charles White | |
74077 | Los Angeles CA | July 8, 2001 | Charles White | |
74080 | ABQ | March 22, 2003 | Jim Hebner | |
74080 | ABQ on train #4 |
March 22, 2003 | Jim Hebner | |
74080 | ABQ | March 22, 2003 | Jim Hebner | |
74092 | Fullerton CA on train #3 |
Dec 21, 2001 | Wayne Buser |
Feb 10, 1999
While the railroads have slowly been exiting the refrigerated
rail car business, Amtrak's Mail and Express business is investing
in it, in an effort to become more truck competitive and expand
upon last year's success.
Amtrak will offer an express four-day, cross-country service for perishable goods with the purchase of a fleet of eight reefer units. Amtrak has not determined from whom the cars will be purchased. Bids are now being finalized, an Amtrak spokesman said. Sherman Oaks, Calif.-based Sunkist Growers Inc. has signed up for five of the cars and will start testing the service in May when Amtrak expects to take delivery of the equipment.
Amtrak entered the temperature-sensitive commodities arena approximately a year ago when it purchased eight ReeferRailer refrigerated rail trailers from Wabash National Corp. Since that time, "the service has gained the overwhelming support of numerous temperature-controlled shippers who view it as offering a clear-cut advantage over trucking schedules and prices in many lanes," Amtrak said.
The new 70-ton reefer cars will be rebuilt to allow them to be used on Amtrak's high-speed passenger trains, which are approved for speeds up to 90 mph in some lanes, Amtrak said. Improvements include a high-speed truck, upgraded braking system, tight-lock couplers and state-of-the-art refrigeration units.
Due to the limited number of cars it
can attach to its passenger trains, Amtrak went with refrigerated
cars, which
can haul three times as much freight as refrigerated rail trailers.
Sunkist will use two passenger trains to move citrus product to the East Coast: Amtrak's Southwest Chief, operating between Los Angeles and Chicago with cars connecting to and from Philadelphia; and between Los Angeles and Jacksonville, Fla., on Amtrak's Sunset Limited.
A desire to increase its transportation
options prompted Sunkist to test out the new service. "Trucks
get
into seasonal shortages, and are a favorite whipping boy of legislators,"
said Sunkist transportation manager Bob Smith. "Not to mention
that, even though fuel prices are low right now, they
can jump up at the blink of an eye. We ship a lot of product,
so the more ways
we can move it, the better. We'll try it for a couple of months
to see how it
goes," Smith said. Sunkist, one of the largest perishable
products shippers in the country, moves roughly 80 percent of
its freight by truck, 16 percent intermodally and the remainder
by mechanical reefer car. "Some of our customers like (reefer
cars) very much," Smith said, "but the average transit
time is 11 to 12 days. So if we can do it in four to five days,
it's obviously a big advantage for perishable product."
If all goes according to plan, Amtrak should be truck competitive with four- day transit times and five-day availability. "We figure six-day availability with intermodal, and if we make the cutoffs here in California and again in Chicago, it will frequently make it to the customer in five days. So intermodal service is pretty good too," said Smith.
The rates Sunkist will be able to get
using Amtrak "remain to be seen," Smith pointed out.
"Obviously the Amtrak
deal will not be as inexpensive as conventional reefer-car transit.
But there's a tradeoff in the transit time too, and part of that
is a function of what we're willing to accept and our customers
are willing to accept. But we're pretty optimistic."
Rail and truck deregulation, along with
the emergence of intermodal, changed the transportation scenario
for
Sunkist and other large perishable-products shippers. "Truck
deregulation got a lot more guys into business, and they thought,
hey I'm in California, I better put a reefer unit on the front
of the trailer and look for stuff to haul back," Smith said,
noting that 20 years ago Sunkist used to ship 12,000 reefer units
a year to the East Coast in seven to eight days.
But the railroads couldn't keep up with
the efficiencies of truck and intermodal. Cycle time on the cars
wasn't
fast enough to justify the utilization and maintenance of such
equipment. "And the classic railroad mentality of the time
was, if you're not going to give us the business, we're not going
to give you the service. And we said well, we're a perishable
shipper and we can't wait around for you to give us the service,
so we'll give it to somebody else," Smith said.
Sunkist has maintained a 500-car-a-year
reefer service for a few select customers, using a daily
Burlington Northern Santa Fe train out of California's northern
central valley and connecting with Conrail in Chicago. "But
it's pretty limited, and that's why we don't try and do more rail
business. We pretty much focus on lanes where they can give us
reasonably decent, consistent service," Smith said.
Sunkist hasn't used Union Pacific Railroad
since before the railroad's service meltdown in 1996. "The
trends were
there with Southern Pacific. They had problems fulfilling our
needs," Smith said. UP still contacts the company periodically,
"but we tell them that when they can get us to Chicago in
a reasonable time, let us know. Otherwise, we're pretty happy
with BNSF," he said.
A source from a large intermodal marketing
company noted that it made sense for a company like Sunkist to
test
the waters. "Whenever somebody comes up with an innovative
new service you ought to support it at least for a while. If it
doesn't get supported, it goes away. Plus, this gives them more
options, and the more options you have the less leverage each
one of those options has against you."
Even though the perishable commodities
business is firmly in the hands of the motor carriers, it could
be a
great opportunity for Amtrak, the IMC source said. "If truck
lines have 99 percent of the business, they don't have much room
to grow. They have to steal from each other," he said.
But will there be a comeback in the
reefer car business? "There's always a market for a new premium
service," he
said, and it could make sense in selected spots.
For Amtrak's part, mail and express
accounted for $83 million of the $1.4 billion in revenue from
the company's
passenger and freight business in fiscal 1998. So far the company
is on track to increase the mail and express portion to $107 million
in fiscal 1999. The goal is to be operationally self- sufficient
by 2002, Amtrak says.
"Since we were made up of the revenue-losing
freight businesses of the railroads, you could say that, in a
way, we were set up to fail," said spokesperson Debbie
Hare. "But we've stayed alive despite that."
Back
to the Amtrak Photo Archive Main Page